President
      Members
      Working Partners
      International Automotive
Association

      Gross Turnover
      Installed Capacity
      Market Share
      Production Trend
      Domestic Sales Trend
      Exports Trend
      Automotive Mission Plan 2006-2016
      Auto Policy-2002
      Duties & Taxes
          Excise
          Customs
          VAT
      Budget
          Pre-Budget Memorandum
          Union Budget Highlights
          Post Budget Memorandum
      Trade Policies
          India's Preferential Trade
          WTO & Indian Automotive
Industry

          Exim Policy
      Regulatory Framework
      Emission Norms
      Safety Regulations
      In-use Vehicle norms
      Lambda Measurement
      Harmonisation
      Notifications
      Motor Vehicle Rules
      UNECE Regulation
      Gasoline
      Diesel
      Bio-Diesel
      Newsletter
      Publications
      Statistical Services
  Events
  Photo Gallery
  SAFE Home
Home>>Economic Affairs>>Post Budget Memorandum(2007-08)
 
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
 
 
 

S.No

Issue

SIAM Suggestion

Explanation

4.

Extension of advance ruling facility for Large Tax payer units under LTU jurisdiction or companies paying more than Rs 5 crore taxes.

Extend advance ruling facility to LTU formation.

While appreciating the move of the Hon. Finance minister towards formation of LTU in the country effective from 1.10.2006, we find it imperative that certain privileges and preferences should be given to the Large tax payers coming under the jurisdiction of the LTU.

It is understood that Central excise and Cenvat rules are amended in order to extend certain preferences and privileges to the LTU formations. However, it is also understood that the LTU policy is not brought into the rule book by legislative changes in the Act. Consequent to introduction of LTU policy by the Government without legislative amendments, it is felt that the true spirit and intention of the Government may not be forthcoming.

For instance, units falling under the jurisdiction of the LTU, as a privileged tax payer would intend the facility of advance ruling in respect of ambiguous issues basically with an intention to avoid forthcoming disputes. In the absence of the provisions of advance ruling under LTU scheme, it cannot be said that tax disputes may not be forthcoming. In fact, advance ruling on critical issues is panaceas for all tax disputes thereby the disputes are totally avoided. Therefore, the advance ruling remedy acts as a dispute avoidance mechanism rather than dispute resolution measure. Accordingly, it is imperative to extend the benefit of advance ruling to the LTU formations.

 
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
 
Site Last updated : Oct 6 2008 7:51PM
© 2005. Copyright. SIAM. All Rights Reserved.